Skip to content
DA
Tax & HMRC

Liquidity pools and impermanent loss: UK tax records

Quick answer: Impermanent loss measures performance against holding the original assets; it is not itself a UK tax deduction. Analyse pool entry, ownership of deposited tokens, LP rights, rewards and exit. The quantities and sterling values on each leg matter more than a dashboard’s profit figure.

Record LP tokens, pool entry and exit, rewards and impermanent loss for UK tax, with current rules separated from proposed April 2027 reform.

Published by Digital Assets Team 2 min read Text version
Not financial advice. This guide is general information only, fact-checked against UK government sources. It is not a personal recommendation. Cryptoassets are high-risk. You may lose all the money you invest.

What impermanent loss actually compares

A pool can return a different mix of assets from the one deposited. “Impermanent loss” compares that outcome with simply holding the original mix. It does not directly calculate taxable proceeds or allowable costs. A pool position can underperform holding while still producing a taxable gain measured in pounds.

Pool entry and the beneficial ownership question

Under HMRC’s current DeFi guidance, a transfer of beneficial ownership can create a disposal. Inspect what rights the pool receives and what the LP token represents. The presence of a smart contract is not a tax exemption. Save the relevant terms and the GBP values at entry.

Sources: HMRC: making a DeFi loan

Keep principal, receipt tokens and rewards separate

Record assets supplied, the LP position received, any reward token and assets returned at exit. This avoids classifying all pool withdrawals as income or assuming that every receipt is simply a return of original cost.

A pool ledger separates economic events
EventRecord separately
DepositQuantity and GBP value of each supplied asset
LP receiptToken ID or position and rights acquired
RewardAsset, quantity, receipt time and character of return
WithdrawalLP rights given up and each asset received
FeeFee token, value and purpose

An illustrative mismatch between return and tax

An investor’s pool ends worth £9,000. Holding the original tokens would have produced £10,000, but the starting cost was £6,000. The £1,000 performance shortfall is not automatically an allowable loss. Tax still requires reconstruction of the actual entry, reward and exit events; the final valuation alone cannot supply the answer.

Visual guide

Performance loss is not the tax loss

Illustrative values · not a tax calculation

The pool ends at £9,000 versus £10,000 for holding, from a £6,000 starting cost. The tax calculation still depends on the actual entry, reward and exit events; impermanent loss alone is not a deduction.

The pool ends at £9,000 versus £10,000 for holding, from a £6,000 starting cost. The tax calculation still depends on the actual entry, reward and exit events; impermanent loss alone is not a deduction.

Read the chart values
  • Starting cost: £6,000. Original investment
  • Pool position at exit: £9,000. Actual ending value
  • Holding the original tokens: £10,000. Comparison scenario

£1,000 behind holding ≠ a £1,000 tax deduction

Source: HMRC DeFi guidance

Proposed reform is a separate tax-year question

The July 2026 draft addresses certain automated market-making arrangements and proposes relief from 6 April 2027. It does not justify retrospectively removing taxable entries from earlier years. Keep quantities and pool rights now so the conditions can be assessed when the rules take effect.

Frequently asked questions

Can I deduct impermanent loss from crypto gains? +

Not simply as a dashboard metric. Calculate the actual tax events and any allowable losses under the applicable rules.

Does withdrawing from a pool only return my capital? +

The output may include different assets, quantities and rewards. Record those separately and assess the rights surrendered.